During the rebirth of Northern Renaissance, artists took a different approach to their masterpieces. Paintings and sculptures were the most popular forms during this era, and it countered what was presented in earlier times prior to this. Although these pieces were attributed and influenced by the church, they contained more than just figures, they presented a story that could be aesthetically portrayed. Famous artists such as the Jan Van Eyck from the documentary, not only created marvelous pieces that would flourish, but he invented a new way to approach the techniques of painting. One of the most remarkable things that Van Eyck did in the film was creating images that not only reflected the light in the suggested areas, but he complimented it with the lighting that would directly affect the painting in reality. This was something that nobody had ever been exposed to before.
As the paintings and sculptures were widely popular, they had reason to stand out as much as they did back then to even today. Within the documentary, they explained how each sculpture was almost embellished with its own personality, its own detail that separated each sculpture so much more from its accompanying pieces. This gave character to each sculpture as it emphasized space and realism through each particular little detail.
It appears that the influence of these works have changed drastically from prior forms, as they now focused on things that were now demanded by churches and patrons, which transformed the aspect of painting from a hobby to a highly respected career. While religious forms of art were still desired, they found new ways to depict how they could make these images or stories come to life. Another high value that was influenced in this time was patrons having artists painting portraits of themselves or regarding their family, which became overly popular in the 15th century.
However, when paintings became the newest standard of artwork, Van Eyck’s career really took off. It was the first time that painters were now heavily commissioned for their work from their patrons, and it opened new doors for artistic creativity. As mentioned, there were many influences that directed how paintings were to be crafted. Religious pieces such as the early alter-pieces have always played a large role in Renaissance art, but it gave artists the opportunity to express more than just one image, instead a collection of images that elaborated a story. They also focused on creating images that were of everyday events that played an important role in Renaissance culture and sometimes even reflected art of an accomplished victory during a battle. But soon after this stage, many painters transformed their skills into portrait paintings, usually suggested by the patron of the artist at the time.
One thing that I believe really separated North Renaissance from the rest was the extreme attention to detail that the artists put into their masterpieces. It was here that figures like Van Eyck really etched a name in what could be considered even in today’s standards as artwork that has more detail than a photograph.
Great job explaining what Jan van Eyck did! He really changed the way people looked at painting with oil. His mastery in oil painting allowed him to achieve this great natural resemblance. He was so good at manipulating this medium that people thought he invented oil painting. At first, I wasn't really sure why people loved paintings from this time more than others but with painters like Van Eyck, along with others, I can clearly see why.
ReplyDeleteThis is really interesting, and also fascinating that Jan Van Eyck was able to paint Giovanni's wife a whole year after she had died. (for I believe that theory is the most likely one)
ReplyDeletemy next comment is a little off topic but please bear with me here... while watching the lectures I was also keeping my Skype video chat open with my guy friend, Clayton; who has a remarkable talent with analyzing people. he got really inspired by what the lecture was saying about Jan Van Eyck and he actually made his own presumption about the artist himself. he suggested that while his paintings were amazing, they were only in depth to the edges of the people almost appearing like painted paper glued on top of one another; but he did not use such a technique...thus such a technique would likely mean that Jan Van Eyck had a visual photographic memory. this would fit perfectly into a lot of his paintings since they obviously took a long time to paint; (it would be nearly impossible for his subjects to stand still so long) and would probably be the missing puzzle piece in the theory of Giovanni's wife in the painting. Jan Van Eyck must have seen her before and that is why he was able to accurately portray her a year later.
I'm going to ask Prof. Bowen about this too, but what do you think about that theory? there was much more to it as well, but too much i fear to discuss here in one comment. sorry for going off on a rant, but this topic fascinates me, and your blog did a good job of drawing that out of me haha
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete